Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Section
Column
width34%
Panel
borderStyle
borderColor#97A0A9
bgColor#F8FCFF
titleBGColor#F2F8FF
borderStyledashed
titleContentsdashed
Table of Contents
minLevel1
outlinefalse
Column
width66%

 

 

 

 

OLE Contribution Requirements

Enhancement/Functional Bug ProcessTechnical Bug ProcessDocumentation Process
  • Proposal submitted
  • Functional Review
  • Code Development
  • Git Pull Request
  • Technical Review

  • Unit Tests / QA Review
  • Documentation 

  • Code Development

  •  Create OLEFDBK
  • Git Pull Request
  • Technical Review
  • Code Merge
  • Documentation files or patch files in the current formats

  • Considerations for Contribution Review

    • Functional requirements and acceptance criteria
    • Any known issues, gaps, bugs, etc.
    • Architecture documented
    • How will the contributor be involved? 

Contribution Checklist

Note

You must have a CLA/CCLA agreement signed and turned in to the Operations Manager, Megan Nolan.

Proposal

  1. Provide functional requirements (template) and acceptance criteria so others know how the contribution is supposed to work.

  2. Note the expected delivery date for the functionality on the JIRA ticket

  3. What technologies are being used (KIM, KNS, KRAD, other libraries, and why?).  See "Additional Resources for Contributions" below
  4. What access would we have to the contributor for questions? - Add to note section

...

Documentation Lead will conduct a review of the documentation to ensure documentation is complete.  For documentation types and instructions, see Documentation Standards and Best Practices.  Once satisfied, documentation is incorporated into the core documentation code by the Documentation Lead.

...

Refer to the Kuali Rice Policies and Standards including the Kuali Rice Development Standards for code coherence tips.

 Other Ways to Contribute

...